In case you hadn't noticed, the peculiar group of people who continue to believe that Barack Obama is ineligible for the Presidency are not going away. As all cult members do when their beliefs are not validated by others, they have doubled down on their beliefs and are frantically filing motions to try and have Barack Obama removed from Democratic Party primary ballots in the individual states, where he is the only candidate. So far, as this report shows, they are 0-16 on those state ballot challenges.
One state where they have been attempting this is Arizona, where the courts are about to rule on a complaint that seeks to have Obama removed from the Democratic Party ballot. Lawyers representing Obama have filed a Motion To Dismiss.
The plaintiff has now filed a Motion To Reconsider..
I want you to compare these two motions. You tell me which one is better structured, more tightly argued, and more compelling to a court. Which one would you be more impressed by when you read it? Bear in mind that a Motion To Reconsider should address all of the points in a respondent's Motion To Dismiss...
By the way, you will notice that the Motion To Reconsider refers prominently to the report of Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse that was unveiled on March 1st. For a number of reasons that I won't go into in detail, but you can read here, that report is NOT a new report that is the result of a full and proper law enforcement investigation. It is a cut-and-paste of information from other sources, and most of that information has already been debunked. By the way, when did you last see a law enforcement body announce that they had found evidence of wrongdoing BEFORE issuing indictments against suspects, and when did you last hear the head of that law enforcement body essentially say "I don't know" when asked what his law enforcement body intends to do in terms of actions on his report?